Happy Thanksgiving

Happy Thanksgiving to all. I've got lots to say about several things, but I've been so busy at work that I haven't had a chance. I'll get back to it.

Will Washington "Abandon" Detroit?

Oh this gets my goat.

Today on the MSN homepage, is the headline: "Will Washington Abandon Detroit?"

What? Abandon?

I think the headline should read: "Republicans get smart - Auto Industry out of luck, out of time for needed change."

Washington isn't 'abandoning' detroit if they don't give them billions of dollars, anymore than washington is 'abandoning' ANY company by NOT giving them money. At what point did NOT giving away taxpayer money becoming 'abandoning'???

Truth is - the republicans just MIGHT get smart enough NOT to pass this. It is NOT the responsibility of the American Taxpayer to ensure a dinosaur business model and concept stay what some might consider 'viable'.

So where does the media, (in this case MSN) get the right to suggest such a thing? Whatever happened to impartial news? How is it that the news/media is allowed to comment on somethings, but choose not to on others?

The media was clearly part of the fear mongering / panic pushing that got the $700 Billion dollar bailout. Maybe they plan on switcing to be a 'bank' so that they can get money too??? And here they go again.

Chrysler's got a deal for you.

I'll preface this post with a quote from the article referenced:

"As a private company, Chrysler can do whatever it wants when it comes to compensating its executives."

Still....
http://blogs.moneycentral.msn.com/topstocks/archive/2008/11/14/chrysler-gives-bonuses-asks-for-bailout.aspx

"The company had no idea that its industry was headed for collapse, ..." uh huh - its a company that makes cars. Cars use gas. Gas is from oil. Oil is a natural resource the likes of which are said to be dwindeling. Did they not know this? Did they not know that the world needs to move to a cleaner, more renewable power source? Maybe they missed the memo.

If indeed: "The industry is asking for $25 billion in low-cost government loans. " and it truly is loans, then perhaps this isn't such a big deal. But my guess? This will be a bailout just like the 'now-becoming-frequent' government intervention. In the end, the government will get a stake in the companies. And by 'government', I really mean, the American Taxpayer.

Oh to be an executive. Do nothing - get paid LOTS of cash - and walk away rich while the company goes under. Oh to be an executive.

$25 Billion wasn't enough, apparently

It appears Obama is 'taking charge' early, a shame he's pushing for the wrong things!

http://blogs.moneycentral.msn.com/topstocks/archive/2008/11/13/obama-floats-50-billion-automaker-bailout.aspx

The auto industry requested a $25 Billion dollar bailout. How kind of our soon-to-be-president to double the offer and push for $50 Billion.

It must not be HIS money he is trying to spend - oh - thats right ... Its the taxpayers money.

My letter to Mike Simpson

The form that it allowed me to fill out had a static 'honorable Mike Simpson' preceeding the text field that allowed me to enter my comments. I wrote this:

-----------------------

Can I remove the 'Honorable' that preceeds your name from this letter? Because I surely do not honor anything about your recent voting habits.

I am DISGUSTED. Disgusted with the measures the government has taken to withdraw power from the people and place it squarely in the hands of corrupt politicians.

I have written you twice about being very saddened by your voting FOR this ... hmmm.. what should we call this obscene bill now? Cause it isn't a mortgage bailout bill. It isn't an economic recovery bill. It isn't a bank bailout bill.

oh - I know. Lets call it the 'Government at will' bill. That has a nice ring to it. Because really, you voted to give the government $700 BILLION taxpayers dollars FOR WHAT!?!?!?? They don't know - nobody knows because the government is just doing whatever the $*&@ they want with it!

THIS is what you voted for? THIS!!!!

I voted against you. I have no idea who I voted for but I voted against you.

Now the government wants to pay health care for the auto industry. What about MY health care - are you going to pay for mine? naw - you're probably too busy making backdoor deals with the auto industry - or the banking system - or, heck - probably working directly with satan!

So - after all that - I'll sum it up with this:

Please. Represent me. Stop representing yourself and the big business that is greasing your palm.

Represent me. Do something - ANYTHING - to make the people you pose to represent, proud of you.

- Johnathan


-----------------------


No, you don't have to be so explicit, so mean, so anything. But Please whatever you want to say - contact your representative today.

Democrats for auto industry bailout

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/27686318

Wow - I've never owned stake in any car companies. Now I will! The deomcrats seem very willing to use my money to buy the auto industry. After all - they own the banking system - why not the auto industry. Lets see - I noticed Best Buy took a cut in their futures - I've never owned stake in that company either - maybe the government can buy into them.

Wait - I have any idea, how about the government buys ALL the businesses in the US! 'Cause they are WELL on their way.

What? You didn't want a stake in the natural resource hogging carbon dioxide spewing US auto industry. TOO BAD!

Please contact your representatives TODAY! Tell them what you think of all this crap! I'll even make it easy for you: https://writerep.house.gov/writerep/welcome.shtml.

Why are we keeping this woman alive?

http://www.nbcnewyork.com/news/local/Nixzmarys-Mom-Gets-Up-to-43-Years-in-Prison.html

"The mother of 7-year-old Nixzmary Brown was sentenced ... for doing nothing as the ... child lay dying in their home."

"Some jurors visibly cringed and wept when shown grim crime-scene photos from the room where Nixzmary was bound to a chair, starved and forced to urinate in a litter box. She was so malnourished when she died that she weighed only 36 pounds -- about half the weight of an average girl that age."

What in the !*#@ are we doing keeping this woman alive? WHY is the American taxpayer now going to have to PAY to #1 - keep the woman live, #2 - pay for all her meals, #1 - pay for the prison in which she will live, #4 - etc.. etc.. etc..??

WHAT??? WHY WHY WHY!!!

Consider this: a 7 year old girl, beaten to death by her mothers husband, Cesar Rodriguez. Why?

"He is serving 29 years on a manslaughter conviction for delivering the fatal blow after Nixzmary was caught stealing yogurt."

WHY are these two people being allowed to stay alive? A 7 year old little girl!!!

Why?

The only place I can find comfort in this is knowing that these two people will burn in hell. Burn In Hell! And for that I am grateful. May all who willingly injure children be swiftly thrust down to hell.

More government mind-changing

I .. AM .. LIVID!


"Troubled assets will not be purchased"

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/27677764

Remember back to the day when the government wanted to purchase bad assests off the books of big (dumb) companies? Remember when they touted a massive, ill-founded, american people despised financial bailout plan? Remember that 700 Billion dollars and the promises that were made? Remember how it was supposed to get the markets moving again?

Yeah, those were the good ol' days.

I know that I have previously mentioned how they were changing their minds and were planning on using some of the money on buying banks -- oops. I mean, buying stock in banks to bolster them up, but this is it now - This Is It.

"Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson said Wednesday the $700 billion government rescue program will not be used to purchase troubled assets as originally planned."

wow - i'm so surprised. NOT!

In fact, everything that was touted in the 700 Billion dollar bailout plan was absolute - complete - entirely - and totally .. GARBAGE. All of it. All. Of. It.

Our politicians, the ones that represent the people of America. The ones that we did (or did not) vote for. The people who DID NOT listen to the American people, in essance, passed a bill that now says 'the government can do whatever they want with 700 BILLION dollars'.

It's not a bailout bill anymore. It's not a mortgage bailout, not a bank bailout, not a big company bailout. Its now been changed to a 'do whatever they want'.

So what are we to do about it? Contact your representatives. Not that it will do us any good - we all saw how well they listened when they passed the horrid thing in the first place.

ugh.

I'm off to email my 'representative' (and that term is now VERY fluid).

Did you know you own part of AIG? -- again!

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/27640655

"The government on Monday provided new financial assistance to troubled insurance giant American International Group, including pouring $40 billion into the company "

GIVE * ME * A * BREAK

I'm really not so hot at math, and I try and avoid it most of the time. I have a computer for a reason - I have a calculator and Google. What more could I need when it comes to math?

But let me try:

According to the Motley Fool, AIG originally received $85B in bailout money. Apparently this was not enough, so they received another $37.8B in October. Now that November has rolled around, why don't we offer up another $40B, just to be safe. We'll re-evaluate a new amount to give AIG when December comes in, if we even make it that long.

Ok - so math... oh my head hurts... uh ---.. I think thats One Hundred Sixty Two (plus) BILLION dollars.

I'm sorry - I can't comprehend that. 162 Billion dollars is too much for me to understand. In the mean time: Congrats - you own lots of AIG now... Except you can't get your money back (nor had a say in giving it).

Something is wrong with our chlidren.

5:45am can't be normal. 5:45am is a bad time to start a day. 5:45am is exactly 35 minutes before my alarm goes off. 5:45am can't be a normal time for our children to start rolling out of bed.

There is something wrong with our children. Did we, as parents, do something wrong that gave our children the idea that they need to be getting up so early? Every morning, we fight the 'get up' time with all 3 of our older children, and here is the dilemma:

Our youngest, we try to keep asleep at least until 7:30a, preferably 8a. But at 6a, when the other kids have long since started to roll out of bed, I have to choose; do I keep them quite, but up? Or do I make them stay in bed until 7a (their normal, allowed, time to get up)? If I force them back to bed and they throw a big stink, they could wake up the baby. And that would be bad, too.

I recognize that in a number of years, the challenge will be reversed and we will be unable to get our children out of their beds in time for school. But for now, I can not understand what pushes them to get up so.dang.early.

If you have any ideas that do not involve chains, whips, gags, sleeping pills, medicine or sharp pops on the head, please feel free to share. Until now, we've been able to avoid the these methods, but golly - we sure would like to sleep in a few minutes past 6am...